+91 98765 43210 | info@asav.com | Mon – Sat, 09:00 – 19:00 IST
Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301
  1. Home
  2. Services
  3. GIS
  4. Cadastral Mapping
GIS

Cadastral Mapping

Parcel digitisation, georeferencing and attribute linkage for land-record programmes.

Cadastral Mapping — representative deliverable
Overview

Cadastral Mapping

Cadastral programmes are dominated by the quality of the source material. Historic maps at unknown scale, mutation sketches, tracings of tracings, records where the written description and the drawn boundary disagree. The digitisation is the easy part; the reconciliation is the work.

We handle cadastral production at programme scale — scanning and georeferencing legacy sheets with residuals reported per sheet, digitising parcel geometry with topology enforced so there are no gaps or overlaps, and linking parcels to the textual record so ownership, area and tax data resolve against the right polygon.

Where the map and the record disagree, we do not adjudicate. We document the discrepancy for the authority to resolve, because that decision is legal, not technical, and pretending otherwise creates problems that surface years later.

What you receive

Every item below is issued in your own template, with your layer conventions, title block and revision scheme.

  • Scanned and georeferenced source sheets with per-sheet residual report
  • Parcel polygon digitisation with topology fully enforced
  • Parcel identifier assignment on the authority's numbering scheme
  • Attribute capture and linkage to the textual land record
  • Area computation and comparison against the recorded area
  • Discrepancy register where map and record disagree
  • Sheet-edge matching and seamless mosaic assembly
  • Mutation and subdivision history handling where required
  • Delivery to geodatabase or PostGIS with validation report

Production detail

Key production parameters for Cadastral Mapping
Typical turnaroundProgramme-based; 8,000–15,000 parcels per month per team
GeoreferencingResiduals reported per sheet against the project tolerance
TopologyNo gaps, no overlaps, closed polygons, validated
Area toleranceRecorded versus computed compared and reported per parcel
Attribute accuracyDouble-entry verification on key fields; 99.5%+ typical
Output formatsGDB, SHP, GeoPackage, PostGIS, DXF, PDF map sheets
RevisionsIncluded per batch until validation passes

Software and formats

We work in your toolchain. If something you use is not listed, ask — the list below is only what we use most.

ArcGIS ProQGISFMEPostGISAutoCAD Map 3DGlobal MapperPython / GDAL

Frequently asked

It is recorded in the discrepancy register with both figures and the difference, and flagged by severity band. We do not adjust geometry to make areas match — that is a legal determination for the authority, and quietly fudging it is how programmes generate litigation.

Yes, and most of the source material we see is poor. Georeferencing residuals are reported per sheet so you can see exactly where confidence is low, and sheets that cannot meet the tolerance are escalated rather than forced.

Double-entry verification on key fields — two operators enter independently and mismatches are adjudicated by a checker — plus automated domain, range and referential checks across the whole batch. Sampled audit on top of that.

Yes, where the programme requires a lineage record. Parent and child parcel relationships are maintained with effective dates so the record can be reconstructed as at any point in time.
Step 2 of 4 in GIS

Send one cadastral mapping job and see how we work

Scope, price and programme come back in writing before anything starts. Most first projects are a single deliverable so you can judge us on output, not on a pitch.

Call an engineer